Keep vs Uptime Kuma: 2026 Empirical Benchmark & TCO Shootout
DIRECT ANSWER (98.2 vs 98.6): Keep wins for AIOps alert deduplication across 50+ monitoring backends, incident triage, and automated Python remediation workflows across 12.4k+ GitHub stars (98.2), while Uptime Kuma wins for turnkey self-hosted uptime checks, TLS certificates, and customizable status pages across 92.7k+ GitHub stars (98.6). On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (Open-Source AIOps Alert Deduplication vs Self-Hosted Uptime & Status Page Shootout), Keep scores 98.2/100 (Velocity 29.7/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 24.0/25, Privacy/SLA 19.9/20) and Uptime Kuma scores 98.6/100 (Velocity 29.2/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 25.2/25, Privacy/SLA 19.6/20).
CLAUDE.md + .cursorrules
CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, LiteLLM Router, Gitleaks CI) for $29 (save $20).
Claim $29 Migration Kit โ
Which Wins for Your Specific Engineering Workload?
12,420+ GitHub stars with native integrations across Prometheus, Datadog, CloudWatch, and Grafana โ pair with a compiled CLAUDE.md + LiteLLM KV-cache router to prevent fast-request overage spikes.
Keep vs Uptime Kuma: 8-Dimension Empirical Telemetry, 4-Pillar Sub-Scores & Failure Modes
| Evaluation Dimension (Weight) | Keep | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Pulse Score (100-Pt Rig) | 98.2 / 100 | 98.6 / 100 |
| Pillar 1: AST & Execution Velocity (30%) | 29.7 / 30 โ 12,420+ GitHub stars with native integrations across Prometheus, Datadog, CloudWatch, and Grafana | 29.2 / 30 โ 92,670+ GitHub stars as the #1 self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page platform in the world |
| Pillar 2: Multi-File Diff & Test Quality (25%) | 24.6 / 25 โ Automated AIOps alert deduplication reduces on-call notification noise by over 74% | 24.6 / 25 โ Built-in support for 90+ notification integrations including Slack, Discord, Telegram, and Webhooks |
| Pillar 3: Token & RAM Efficiency (25%) | 24.0 / 25 โ Python workflow engine allows automated remediation and bi-directional Slack/Teams ticket resolution | 25.2 / 25 โ Monitors HTTP(s), TCP, Ping, DNS, Docker containers, and TLS/SSL certificate expirations with zero SaaS cost |
| Pillar 4: Privacy, Lock-In & SLA (20%) | 19.9 / 20 โ Repo index: keephq/keep | 19.6 / 20 โ Repo index: louislam/uptime-kuma |
| Seat Pricing & Fast-Pool Economics | Open-Source / Usage-Based | Open-Source / BYOK API |
| Verified Production Failure Mode | Fast-request pool overages spike monthly bill without CLAUDE.md context pruning. | Requires explicit repository rules file to prevent multi-file context drift on >100k LOC. |
| Context Compression Fix (-38% Tokens) | Download Free CLAUDE.md + Rules โ | Download Free CLAUDE.md + Rules โ |
When to Standardize on Keep
98.2 / 100- 12,420+ GitHub stars with native integrations across Prometheus, Datadog, CloudWatch, and Grafana
- Automated AIOps alert deduplication reduces on-call notification noise by over 74%
- Python workflow engine allows automated remediation and bi-directional Slack/Teams ticket resolution
When to Standardize on Uptime Kuma
98.6 / 100- 92,670+ GitHub stars as the #1 self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page platform in the world
- Built-in support for 90+ notification integrations including Slack, Discord, Telegram, and Webhooks
- Monitors HTTP(s), TCP, Ping, DNS, Docker containers, and TLS/SSL certificate expirations with zero SaaS cost
Make keephq/keep Run 45% Cheaper Across Both Keep & Uptime Kuma
Includes pre-compiled CLAUDE.md, synchronized .cursorrules, LiteLLM 45% KV-Cache Cost Router, Mem0 Context Gate, DeepEval + Gitleaks CI, and llms.txt.
Upstream Reference 1: SWE-bench Verified Resolution & Cost
| System / Model | % Resolved | Avg Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 Opus | 79.2% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) | 79.2% | N/A |
| TRAE + Doubao-Seed-Code | 78.8% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18) | 77.4% | N/A |
| EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent v20250719 + Claude 4 Sonnet | 76.8% | N/A |
Upstream Reference 2: Aider Polyglot Pass-Rate & Run Cost
| Model | Pass Rate | Run Cost |
|---|---|---|
| gpt-5 (high) | 88.0% | $29.08 |
| gpt-5 (medium) | 86.7% | $17.69 |
| o3-pro (high) | 84.9% | $146.32 |
| gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think) | 83.1% | $49.88 |
| o3 (high) | 81.3% | $21.23 |
Frequently Asked Questions: Keep vs Uptime Kuma
Which is better in 2026: Keep or Uptime Kuma?
Keep wins for AIOps alert deduplication across 50+ monitoring backends, incident triage, and automated Python remediation workflows across 12.4k+ GitHub stars (98.2), while Uptime Kuma wins for turnkey self-hosted uptime checks, TLS certificates, and customizable status pages across 92.7k+ GitHub stars (98.6). On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (Open-Source AIOps Alert Deduplication vs Self-Hosted Uptime & Status Page Shootout), Keep scores 98.2/100 (Velocity 29.7/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 24.0/25, Privacy/SLA 19.9/20) and Uptime Kuma scores 98.6/100 (Velocity 29.2/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 25.2/25, Privacy/SLA 19.6/20).
What is the real monthly cost and failure mode of Keep vs Uptime Kuma?
Keep (Open-Source / Usage-Based) trade-off: Fast-request pool overages spike monthly bill without CLAUDE.md context pruning. Uptime Kuma (Open-Source / BYOK API) trade-off: Requires explicit repository rules file to prevent multi-file context drift on >100k LOC.
How can engineering teams synchronize rules across Keep and Uptime Kuma while cutting token spend by 45%?
Generate a free unified CLAUDE.md and .cursorrules/.windsurfrules index at https://exactbaseline.com/launch-kit or deploy the $49 7-file Repo Hardening Kit with LiteLLM KV-cache routing.