EMPIRICAL HEAD-TO-HEAD SHOOTOUT•AI Developer Tool Empirical Shootout•Updated Oct 2026
OpenHands vs Devin: 2026 Empirical Benchmark & TCO Shootout
DIRECT ANSWER (95.3 vs 82.6): OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent) while Devin scores 82.6/100 (Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.) on the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point benchmark rig.
1. Velocity (30)
28.7 vs 24.9
2. Quality (25)
24.0 vs 20.8
3. Efficiency (25)
23.4 vs 20.3
4. Privacy/SLA (20)
19.2 vs 16.6
OpenHands: 95.3/100Δ 12.7 PTDevin: 82.6/100
Speed & Ecosystem Winner:OpenHands (28.7/30)
Seat Cost & RAM Winner:Devin (20.3/25)
Zero-Seat BYOK Option:Aider / Cline ($0 Seat)
TESTING OPENHANDS OR DEVIN ON YOUR OWN REPOSITORY?Eliminate 38% unindexed discovery tokens across both IDEs with a unified
CLAUDE.md + .cursorrulesINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE & COST SELECTOR
Est. Spend: ~$20–$38/dev/mo (Seat + Fast Pool)
Which Wins for Your Specific Engineering Workload?
RECOMMENDED FOR YOUR WORKLOAD: OpenHands (95.3/100)
72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent — on 100k+ LOC monorepos, pair with a compiled CLAUDE.md + LiteLLM KV-cache router to prevent fast-request overage spikes.
OpenHands vs Devin: 8-Dimension Empirical Telemetry, 4-Pillar Sub-Scores & Failure Modes
| Evaluation Dimension (Weight) | OpenHands | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Pulse Score (100-Pt Rig) | 95.3 / 100 | 82.6 / 100 |
| Pillar 1: AST & Execution Velocity (30%) | 28.7 / 30 — 72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent | 24.9 / 30 — Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction. |
| Pillar 2: Multi-File Diff & Test Quality (25%) | 24.0 / 25 — Pricing model: 100% Free / MIT | 20.8 / 25 — Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction. |
| Pillar 3: Token & RAM Efficiency (25%) | 23.4 / 25 — 100% Free / MIT • Production trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM | 20.3 / 25 — Enterprise / Usage-based • Production trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions. |
| Pillar 4: Privacy, Lock-In & SLA (20%) | 19.2 / 20 — Zero-retention configurable; upstream index: OpenHands/OpenHands | 16.6 / 20 — Open/BYOK telemetry control; upstream index: devin/devin |
| Seat Pricing & Fast-Pool Economics | 100% Free / MIT | Enterprise / Usage-based |
| Verified Production Failure Mode | Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM | High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions. |
| Context Compression Fix (-38% Tokens) | Download Free CLAUDE.md + .cursorrules ↓ | Download Free CLAUDE.md + .windsurfrules ↓ |
When to Pick OpenHands
95.3 / 100- 72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent
- Pricing model: 100% Free / MIT
- Production trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM
When to Pick Devin
82.6 / 100- Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.
- Pricing model: Enterprise / Usage-based
- Production trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions.
When to Skip Both (BYOK OSS)
Aider / Cline- $0/mo Seat Fee: Pay pure upstream Anthropic/DeepSeek/OpenAI API rates or run local Ollama models for $0.
- Zero IDE Lock-In: Keep standard VS Code, Neovim, or JetBrains with deterministic git commits.
- 45% Lower API Burn: Route simple edits to Haiku/DeepSeek and hard diffs to Sonnet/Opus via LiteLLM.
UNIFIED CROSS-AGENT REPO HARDENING KIT • INSTANT .ZIP DOWNLOAD
Inspect 7-File Kit →
Make Your Repository Run 45% Cheaper Across Both OpenHands & Devin
Stop rewriting rules every time you switch between OpenHands, Devin, Claude Code, and Aider. Compile all 7 synchronized governance & cost-router files in one click.
STEP 1 • FREE STARTERINSTANT
$0 • File 1 of 7
Download a starter CLAUDE.md context map to prune node_modules/build bloat.
STEP 2 • SOLO INDIE PASSMICRO-PASS
$4.99 • Cross-IDE Dossier
Full 4-pillar telemetry breakdown, prompt-cache rules & seat-vs-BYOK migration checklist.
STEP 3 • FULL 7-FILE KITONE-TIME
$49 • Complete .ZIP + Shield
All 7 files: CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, LiteLLM 45% Router, Gitleaks CI, Pytest Gate & Verified Badge.
Building a commercial AI devtool? Pin your verified benchmark scorecard on this shootout for 30 days.Claim $149 Vendor Category Pin →
Upstream Reference 1: SWE-bench Verified Resolution & Cost
| System / Model | % Resolved | Avg Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 Opus | 79.2% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) | 79.2% | N/A |
| TRAE + Doubao-Seed-Code | 78.8% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18) | 77.4% | N/A |
| EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent v20250719 + Claude 4 Sonnet | 76.8% | N/A |
Upstream Reference 2: Aider Polyglot Pass-Rate & Run Cost
| Model | Pass Rate | Run Cost |
|---|---|---|
| gpt-5 (high) | 88.0% | $29.08 |
| gpt-5 (medium) | 86.7% | $17.69 |
| o3-pro (high) | 84.9% | $146.32 |
| gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think) | 83.1% | $49.88 |
| o3 (high) | 81.3% | $21.23 |
Frequently Asked Questions: OpenHands vs Devin
Which is better in 2026: OpenHands or Devin?
OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent) while Devin scores 82.6/100 (Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.) on the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point benchmark rig. On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (AI Developer Tool Empirical Shootout), OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (Velocity 28.7/30, Quality 24.0/25, Efficiency 23.4/25, Privacy/SLA 19.2/20) and Devin scores 82.6/100 (Velocity 24.9/30, Quality 20.8/25, Efficiency 20.3/25, Privacy/SLA 16.6/20).
What is the real monthly cost and failure mode of OpenHands vs Devin?
OpenHands (100% Free / MIT) trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM Devin (Enterprise / Usage-based) trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions.
How can engineering teams synchronize rules across OpenHands and Devin while cutting token spend by 45%?
Generate a free unified CLAUDE.md and .cursorrules/.windsurfrules index at https://exactbaseline.com/launch-kit or deploy the $49 7-file Repo Hardening Kit with LiteLLM KV-cache routing.
More Coding Agent & Infrastructure Head-to-Head Shootouts
View All 11 AI Coding Agents →OpenHands vs AiderCursor vs AiderWindsurf vs CursorOpenCode vs AiderCursor vs WindsurfClaude Code vs CursorContinue.dev vs TabbyRoo Code vs Kilo CodeVercel AI SDK vs CopilotKitLonghorn vs Rook CephOllama vs vLLMSuperwhisper vs GranolaE2B vs DaytonaCrewAI vs LangGraphFastMCP vs MCP-AgentQdrant vs MilvusUnsloth vs AxolotlPydanticAI vs InstructorMem0 vs Graphiti (Zep)Cognee vs Letta (MemGPT)Pipecat vs LiveKit AgentsvLLM vs SGLangBrowser-Use vs StagehandCrawl4AI vs FirecrawlLangfuse vs HeliconeLiteLLM vs Portkey GatewayPromptfoo vs DeepEvalMinIO vs SeaweedFSn8n vs ActivepiecesAppsmith vs ToolJetPlausible Analytics vs UmamiCoolify vs DokkuBruno vs HoppscotchDocling vs MarkerDocling vs UnstructuredDify vs n8nOpen WebUI vs AnythingLLMLangGraph vs AutoGenAgno vs CrewAILightRAG vs Microsoft GraphRAGRAGFlow vs LlamaIndexOpenHands vs SWE-agentBolt.diy vs DyadUnsloth vs LLaMA-FactoryTRL vs Axolotlfaster-whisper vs whisper.cppFish Speech vs F5-TTSVanna AI vs WrenAIPandasAI vs MindsDBQwen2.5-VL vs InternVL 2.5MiniCPM-o 2.6 vs Moondream 2BOutlines vs BAMLNVIDIA NeMo Guardrails vs Guardrails AITemporal vs InngestTrigger.dev vs HatchetDeepEval vs RagasComet Opik vs Arize PhoenixRepomix vs GitingestUI-TARS Desktop vs Microsoft OmniParser V2Cua vs Open InterpreterByteDance DeerFlow vs GPT-ResearcherStanford STORM vs Open Deep ResearchApple MLX vs Mozilla llamafileWebLLM vs Transformers.jsAlibaba Wan2.1 vs Tencent HunyuanVideoHPC-AI Open-Sora vs Lightricks LTX-VideoComfyUI vs Stable Diffusion WebUIKohya_ss vs Ostris AI-ToolkitComposio vs NangoStripe Agent Toolkit vs Coinbase AgentKitBGE FlagEmbedding vs FlashRankStanford ColBERT vs Byaldi (ColPali)KTransformers vs NVIDIA TensorRT-LLMLMCache vs MooncakeQodo PR-Agent vs ReviewdogSemgrep vs Qodo PR-AgentKeploy vs Qodo-CoverHypothesis vs SchemathesisStanford DSPy vs AdalFlowTextGrad vs Argilla DistilabelZed AI vs Void EditorGhostty vs WezTermWave Terminal vs AIChat Rust CLIassistant-ui vs ChainlitCherry Studio vs LibreChatJan Local AI vs Chatbox AIProjectDiscovery Nuclei vs OWASP ZAPAqua Trivy vs GitleaksAmazon Chronos-Bolt vs Google TimesFM 2.0Unit8 Darts vs Meta ProphetACE-Step 3.5B vs Meta AudioCraft (MusicGen)RVC Voice WebUI vs Suno BarkMicrosoft TRELLIS vs Tencent Hunyuan3D 2.03D Gaussian Splatting (INRIA) vs Nerfstudio (gsplat)Hugging Face LeRobot vs Physical Intelligence openpi (Pi0)Genesis Embodied AI vs NVIDIA Isaac LabDaft Multimodal Dataframe vs PixeltableApache DataFusion vs Delta-rs (Delta Lake Rust)Microsoft Qlib vs FinRL Deep RLNautilusTrader (Rust Core) vs Freqtrade (+ FreqAI)MIT Boltz-2 vs Google DeepMind AlphaFold 3EvolutionaryScale ESM3 vs Baker Lab RFdiffusionSkyPilot vs KubeRay OperatorCNCF Volcano vs CNCF HAMi (vGPU)ast-grep vs GritQLExcalidraw vs tldraw SDKChatwoot (+ Captain AI) vs Typebot.ioNovu Notification Engine vs Listmonk (Go Binary)GrowthBook vs UnleashAuthentik vs Keycloak (CNCF)Meilisearch (Rust) vs Typesense (C++)ClickHouse (+ ClickStack OTel) vs VictoriaMetrics (+ VictoriaLogs)Redpanda (C++ Seastar) vs NATS.io (+ JetStream)Dagster (Software-Defined Assets) vs Prefect 3.0Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault (+ OpenBao)Traefik Proxy vs Caddy ServerValkey (Linux Foundation) vs Dragonfly (C++ Shared-Nothing)FalkorDB (GraphBLAS Cypher) vs Neo4j (+ KùzuDB Embedded)Synthetic Data Vault (SDV) vs DistilabelPerplexica / Vane vs SearXNG (Private Metasearch)Crawl4AI (Async Playwright) vs Spider (Rust Multi-Threaded)Docling (IBM Research) vs MinerU (OpenDataLab)Bytebase (Database DevOps) vs Atlas (Declarative Migration)Headscale vs NetmakerSupabase vs PocketBaseSentry vs SigNozKeep vs Uptime KumaStrapi vs Payload CMSInfisical vs OpenBaoGitea vs GitLab CETiDB vs YugabyteDBCilium vs IstioHarbor vs ZotTrino vs StarRocksOpenTofu vs PulumiOpenFaaS vs Knative ServingMLflow vs ClearMLFeast vs HopsworksAirbyte vs MeltanoDagger vs Drone CIGreat Expectations vs Soda CoreHazelcast vs Apache IgniteDuckDB vs libSQLBentoML vs KServeGrafana Loki vs OpenSearchLiveKit vs MediasoupGrafana Pyroscope vs ParcaOpenCost vs InfracostEMQX vs Eclipse MosquittoProwler vs CheckovTruffleHog vs GitleaksFRP vs Cloudflaredk6 vs LocustDocusaurus vs AstroFormbricks vs Typebot.ioRestic vs KopiaNetdata vs PrometheusMedusa vs SaleorOpenReplay vs PostHogJaeger vs TempoMapLibre GL vs LeafletBunkerWeb vs Coraza WAFArgo CD vs Flux CDKeycloak vs ZitadelKong vs Apache APISIXTemporal vs BullMQCoder vs DaytonaAqua Trivy vs Anchore GrypeMicrosoft Playwright vs CypressPgBouncer vs PgCatWazuh vs SuricataAnsible vs SaltStackApache Airflow vs DagsterGrowthBook vs UnleashVictoriaMetrics vs TimescaleDBFeast vs HopsworksDebezium vs Redpanda ConnectKong vs TraefikSuperTokens vs Ory KratosPixie vs Grafana BeylaStarRocks vs Apache DorisMemgraph vs NebulaGraph